After watching more news that I wanted to this week I was knocked down by Senator John Kennedy from Louisiana, after listening to Senator John Kennedy with Chris Wallace I could not believe thus man had a college education. More amazing was the fact he was an attorney with credentials from Vanderbilt, Virginia School of Law and civil law degree from Oxford University. Where did all this education go? This man goes on national TV and sounds like a care salesmen spouting Russian propaganda straight out of Putin’s playbook. Below are some facts about his TV appearances.
Republican Sen. John Kennedy was widely pilloried in the non-Trump, reality-based world for his appearance on Fox News Sunday, where the first-term Louisiana senator regurgitated a Trump conspiracy theory that perhaps it was Ukraine, not Russia, that hacked the Democrats in 2016, we just don’t know, nobody really knows, perhaps we should investigate? It’s a typically mind-bending, self-serving Trump talking point, where “people are saying” something totally made up; Trump’s just asking the questions. Where’s the server?
Chris Wallace: Who do you believe was responsible for hacking the DNC and Clinton campaign computers, their emails? Was it Russia or Ukraine?
Sen. John Kennedy: I don’t know. Nor do you. Nor do any of us.
Wallace: Let me just interrupt to say: The entire intelligence community says it was Russia.
Kennedy: Right. But it could also be Ukraine. I’m not saying I know one way or the other.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I’m glad. In our show open, you heard a quote from yourself talking about what is appropriate and inappropriate in terms of quid pro quos. If a quid pro quo was shown to be for the president’s own political benefit, is that appropriate?
SEN. KENNEDY: The quid pro quo, in my judgment, is a red herring. Here- here are the two possible scenarios. Number one, the president asked for an investigation of a political rival. Number two, the president asked for an investigation of possible corruption by someone who happens to be a political rival. The latter would be in the national interest. The former would be in the president’s parochial interests and would be over the line.
I think this case is going to come down to the president’s intent- his motive. Did he have a culpable state of mind? For me, Margaret, there are only two relevant questions that need to be answered. Why did the president ask for an investigation? And number two, and this is inextricably linked to the first question, what did Mr. Hunter Biden do for the money?
Support the cause: Buy and wear one of our Anti-Trump T-Shirts and make a statement and help the DNC and Dump Trump now. You can support the DNC with a purchase at www.saveamericadumptrump.com
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, I want to ask you now. There have been more than twenty five hundred pages of sworn testimony that have been released to the public. Have you read any of those depositions?
SEN. KENNEDY: I’ve read some, but any lawyer, in my judgment, who knows a law book from a J. Crew catalog knows that a- a sterile transcript is no substitute for live witnesses.
It is plain to see Senator Kennedy is a Trump supported who has not done his homework as to have talking points to defend (King Trump) the President. Kennedy continually mumbles on about nonsense while deflecting all account to reality. The senator had time to see and hear 12 witnesses to the crimes of King Trump in his “perfecto” call to President Zelensky of the Ukraine. It’s time the republican senators start reading about their constitutional duties. Some senators Like Moscow Mitch and Brown Nosed Lindsey Graham reread their oath of office. “The Times Are A Changin”.